MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201229
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 02:06
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 83.2
1-Core 156
2-Core 300
97% 180 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 867
87% 708 Pts
64-Core 1,087
67% 1,087 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
MSI(1462 3860) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 155
Reflection 149
Parallax 151
126% 151 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 127
Splatting 114
112% 140 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 835 414 418 408 371 376 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,451
Write 1,664
Mixed 1,278
SusWrite 470
273% 1,216 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 52.7
216% 81.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,240
DQ Write 865
DQ Mixed 1,004
763% 1,036 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 199%
Great: 237%
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
9GB free
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 171 7.3 4.1 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.2% Very poor
Read 256
Write 71
Mixed 10
SusWrite 32.9
20% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 4.9
12% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 85%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
42GB free
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 417 422 416 441 434 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 418
Mixed 273
SusWrite 424
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 30.6
123% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 142
119% 174 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
86GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 113 89 92 102 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 124
Write 152
Mixed 97
SusWrite 104
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
934GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 183 195 190 194 194 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 126
Write 117
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 189
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$102
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 34
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 33.4
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 32.3
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $995
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback