Phoenix/sis M7x0S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive24.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemPhoenix/sis M7x0S  (all builds)
MotherboardSiS M7x0S
Memory1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date27920828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '21 at 20:55
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 24%
CPU Throttled 95%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T6400-$99
uPGA 479M, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
30.4% Below average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 22.1
2-Core 42.8
29% 40.7 Pts
4-Core 24
8-Core 25.4
3% 24.7 Pts
64-Core 25.3
2% 25.3 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 40%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 76 72 67 72 69 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.9% Poor
Read 71.5
Write 51.8
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 66.3
14% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 9.8
49% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 78.2
DQ Write 73.3
DQ Mixed 26.2
33% 59.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
5.86% Terrible
MC Read 0.9
MC Write 1
MC Mixed 2.4
4% 1.43 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 1.1
3% 0.9 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.86%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback