Foxconn 45GM/45CM/45CM-S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardFoxconn 45GM/45CM/45CM-S  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '21 at 15:23
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 2140-$45
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Memory 63
1-Core 17.7
2-Core 30.9
28% 37.2 Pts
4-Core 30.2
8-Core 32.1
4% 31.1 Pts
64-Core 32.9
2% 32.9 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 120GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSF043C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 64 59 55 43 35 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.7% Average
Read 206
Write 219
Mixed 208
SusWrite 60.4
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 28.1
94% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 31.7
DQ Write 81
DQ Mixed 44.7
38% 52.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 84%
JMicron Generic 1TB
71GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 22 20 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 25.5
Mixed 16
SusWrite 21.9
31% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 145%
Generic MassStorageClass 537GB
498GB free, PID 4567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 6 11 15 7.4 9.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.22% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 7.3
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 9
14% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.1
54% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.22%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.77% Terrible
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.07 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 0.9
SC Mixed 1
2% 0.73 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.77%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 45GM/45CM/45CM-S Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn 45GM/45CM/45CM-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback