ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-M720-ES3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-M720-ES3 (all builds)
Memory	0.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100519
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '21 at 15:07
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 920 1,017 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Memory 76.3 1-Core 41.1 2-Core 82.1 44% 66.5 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 135 18% 132 Pts	64-Core 144 9% 144 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT 19,550 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 34AF) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	6.53% Terrible	Lighting 8.9 Reflection 11.6 Parallax 2.5 7% 7.67 fps	MRender 8.1 Gravity 7.4 Splatting 4.2 5% 6.57 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.53% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 120GB-$98 9,315 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8FM06.5 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 63.6 Write 62.6 Mixed 29.8 12% 52 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 16 4K Mixed 10.2 42% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 23.7 DQ Write 16.1 DQ Mixed 12.7 11% 17.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 84%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 212GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 82 84 80 84 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 78.3 Write 85.1 Mixed 60 SusWrite 81.7 56% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 62%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 273GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 49 51 56 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 98.9 Write 98.9 Mixed 66 SusWrite 52.2 58% 79 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 62%
Seagate ST380215AS 80GB-$45 2,707 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 3GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 48 50 56 56 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 68.1 Write 11.2 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 51.5 29% 39.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 42%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 4GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	8.48% Terrible	Read 16.2 Write 9.4 Mixed 8.2 SusWrite 3.5 11% 9.32 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.8 124% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.48% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	21.6% Poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 7.5 20% 6.93 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 6.2 16% 5.43 GB/s	Latency 87.7 46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback