Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '21 at 02:27
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 69.4
1-Core 147
2-Core 292
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 854
81% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,060
66% 1,060 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.4% Good
Lighting 86
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 127
70% 94.2 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 97.7
Splatting 42.8
53% 67.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 215
Write 239
Mixed 111
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 48.7
172% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 239
204% 301 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 105%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 168 145 181 178 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 181
Write 181
Mixed 110
SusWrite 169
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.7
8% 3.77 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 1.2
2% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20%
Great: 23%
SanDisk Cruzer 1GB
1GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 25.3
Mixed 5.3
13% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
32% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT16GX4M2C3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.4% Good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 27
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 24.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO Builds (Compare 1,125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,009
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback