Samsung 700T1C

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Samsung 700T1C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG XE700T1C-G01ES
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140215
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '21 at 23:50
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	50%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3337U 33,616 User benchmarks, average bench 47% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Memory 58.7 1-Core 21.5 2-Core 29 28% 36.4 Pts	4-Core 49.1 8-Core 50.2 7% 49.7 Pts	64-Core 45.6 3% 45.6 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0E1) 1.5GB Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3190 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.01% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 0.6 Parallax 1 1% 0.93 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.01% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 500GB 2,934 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 200 238 271 215 271 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.3% Average	Read 114 Write 79.9 Mixed 160 SusWrite 232 33% 146 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 21.8 4K Mixed 16.1 49% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 150 114% 155 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 118%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 125GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 114GB free, PID 0727 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 14 12 15 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	5.74% Terrible	Read 15.5 Write 5.8 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 13.2 13% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.6 30% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.74% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x4GB 437 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 7.6 23% 8 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 5.3 14% 4.9 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700T1C Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700T1C

CPU
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	35x
Core i5-3337UIntelBench 47%, 33,616 samples	19x
Core i5-2537MIntelBench 44%, 490 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	54x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	2x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	2x

SSD
MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,350 samples	29x
U100 128GBSandiskBench 38%, 2,261 samples	9x
LMT-128M6M 128GBLiteonitBench 71%, 622 samples	6x

RAM
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 437 samples	50x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 26%, 5,316 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16