Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 186%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 211%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 23:45
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 84.1
1-Core 160
2-Core 315
100% 186 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 1,186
106% 895 Pts
64-Core 2,192
136% 2,192 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 5013 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 275
Reflection 236
Parallax 284
224% 265 fps
MRender 308
Gravity 240
Splatting 180
191% 242 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 190%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1226 833 839 848 799 624 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 1,931
Write 2,186
Mixed 1,702
SusWrite 862
375% 1,670 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 77.2
277% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,345
DQ Write 1,095
DQ Mixed 1,200
904% 1,213 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 269%
Great: 284%
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$100
820GB free
Firmware: 02J0S8KA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 414 391 416 415 414 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 415
Mixed 412
SusWrite 410
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 57.1
184% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 132
118% 178 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 112%
Great: 126%
WD Re 2TB-$35
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 127 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 135
Write 120
Mixed 106
SusWrite 126
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
223% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 83%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$99
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 201 203 205 203 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 177
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 202
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion 250GB
181GB free
Firmware: 0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 91 91 90 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 87.4
Write 86.6
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 89.7
60% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 50%
ADATA CH11 500GB
466GB free, PID a11a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 108 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 106
Write 105
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 108
118% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 50.9
MC Write 44.9
MC Mixed 44.9
134% 46.9 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 40.8
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 125%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,011
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback