Lenovo 81H5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81H5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190509
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 23:16
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FT4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 106
48% 78.9 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 106
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 78.4
5% 78.4 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 39F5) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
3.58% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 5.9
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 6.7
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RTOTJ128VGD2EYX 128GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T2001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 112 118 116 114 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 439
Write 133
Mixed 164
SusWrite 117
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 27.5
106% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 108
96% 145 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:0x 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
25.1% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.9
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81H5 Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81H5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback