HP h9-1150

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP h9-1150 (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AD5
Memory	28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120216
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '21 at 18:59
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3550-$335 23,599 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 101 2-Core 197 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 382 50% 377 Pts	64-Core 385 24% 385 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(1B0A 90A2) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	8.87% Terrible	Lighting 10.1 Reflection 14.9 Parallax 9.6 8% 11.5 fps	MRender 15.6 Gravity 11.5 Splatting 10.8 10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.87% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: MN6OA5Q0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 116 109 104 108 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 75.8 Write 79.9 Mixed 43.2 SusWrite 107 56% 76.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 85%
hp USB Flash Drive 8GB 172 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID b107 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.5 7.2 6.8 6.8 6.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	3.2% Terrible	Read 10.8 Write 8.5 Mixed 7 SusWrite 7.4 11% 8.43 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.2% Great: 8%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 23GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 13 14 13 13 13 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 28.1 Write 18.6 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 13.7 26% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 4.1 266% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.M16 4x8GB 620 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 17.8 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.7 50% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical h9-1150 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 55%

Yacht

System: HP h9-1150

CPU
Core i5-3550Intel $335Bench 69%, 23,599 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	3x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	2x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	2x

SSD
Blue 500GBWD $94Bench 86%, 19,345 samples	2x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
P4-240 240GBBench 62%, 2,162 samples	1x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GBCorsairBench 55%, 2,577 samples	3x
16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 10GBMicronBench 40%, 11 samples	2x
M378B1G73BH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U7CFR8C-PB Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Hynix HMT425U6AFR6C-PB 18GBSamsungBench 53%, 2 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $624

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16