Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5365 7 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU-A ( 0 ), 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Memory 60.5 1-Core 34.4 2-Core 67.2 36% 54 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 129 17% 129 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8094) 2GB CLim: 600 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.6% Terrible	Lighting 4.7 Reflection 4 Parallax 6.6 4% 5.1 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 5.1 Splatting 3.2 3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.6% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 185 193 197 200 198 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.6% Above average	Read 204 Write 196 Mixed 186 SusWrite 191 44% 194 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 31.4 104% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 33.7 DQ Write 67.2 DQ Mixed 43.2 35% 48 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x2GB 8,850 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 8 of 8 slots used 16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 4 11% 3.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 142%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X53651stBench 44%, 504 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon 51501stBench 40%, 627 samples	14x
CPU: Intel Xeon X53551stBench 42%, 426 samples	13x

SSD
750 EVO 120GBSamsung $35Bench 93%, 20,420 samples	5x
128GB 128GBXraydiskBench 63%, 994 samples	4x
480GB SATA SSD 480GBPNYBench 80%, 729 samples	4x

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $35