Alzenit X79M-CE3 PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAlzenit X79M-CE3 PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 13:51
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 100
2-Core 190
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 701
63% 531 Pts
64-Core 882
55% 882 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 4.5
3% 4.6 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X1120G 120GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 100 72 74 72 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 449
Write 267
Mixed 317
SusWrite 125
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 26
99% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 188
163% 239 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HUS726060ALE614 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: APGNW517
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 130 132 132 130 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 143
Write 151
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 131
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-017.A 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 11.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79M-CE3 PLUS Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Alzenit X79M-CE3 PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback