Asrock X570M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X570M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190705
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '21 at 10:42
Run Duration	554 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Memory 69.3 1-Core 142 2-Core 271 86% 161 Pts	4-Core 502 8-Core 808 80% 655 Pts	64-Core 988 61% 988 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 874D) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	59.5% Above average	Lighting 76.3 Reflection 79.1 Parallax 74.2 62% 76.5 fps	MRender 62.8 Gravity 76 Splatting 61.2 54% 66.7 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 279 276 269 255 262 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 411 Mixed 348 SusWrite 272 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 81.6 4K Mixed 42.9 149% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 204 153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 393GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1085 857 854 852 813 802 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	294% Outstanding	Read 2,568 Write 2,378 Mixed 1,853 SusWrite 877 429% 1,919 MB/s	4K Read 64.6 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 86.8 285% 98.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,279 DQ Write 910 DQ Mixed 1,056 799% 1,082 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 294% Great: 355%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1GB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 87.7 Write 117 Mixed 70.3 68% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.6 202% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
WD WD120EMAZ-11BLFA0 12TB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 5GB free Firmware: 81.00A81 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 124 Write 131 Mixed 74 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 1 333% 3.83 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 5.9 DQ Mixed 1.4 18% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 114%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 27GB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 96 96 98 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 97.5 Write 60.5 Mixed 62 SusWrite 94.6 58% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 8GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 140 143 147 144 144 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 68 Write 110 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 142 70% 95.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.6 221% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 90%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 3GB free Firmware: AR15 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 122 Write 110 Mixed 64.5 73% 98.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 0.7 283% 3.77 MB/s	DQ Read 1.7 DQ Write 10.4 DQ Mixed 3 37% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3GB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 127 Write 114 Mixed 75.3 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.6 212% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
WD WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB 1,009 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 0GB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 168 Write 180 Mixed 85 106% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.1 280% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 105%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 160GB 149GB free Firmware: 040B SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 44 44 44 44 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25% Poor	Read 43.3 Write 43.2 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 43.6 28% 38.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s

WD WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB 1,009 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 1GB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 178 Write 178 Mixed 86.3 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.1 303% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 105%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 5,351 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1GB free Firmware: 81.00A81 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 180 Write 180 Mixed 98.3 113% 153 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 1.4 347% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 105%
Inateck ASM1153E 1.5TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 253GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 72 72 73 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 69.5 Write 50 Mixed 51.3 SusWrite 72.3 45% 60.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 77%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 7GB free Firmware: MN6OA5C0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 146 Write 150 Mixed 78.7 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 85%
External USB3.0 8TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 3GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 91 Write 101 Mixed 65.8 109% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.2 214% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 81%
External USB3.0 10TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 104 Write 110 Mixed 67.5 118% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.2 211% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 74%
External USB3.0 10TB 2GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 91.8 Write 121 Mixed 97.7 137% 103 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 1.6 345% 4.3 MB/s	DQ Read 0.7 DQ Write 5.8 DQ Mixed 1.5 251% 2.67 MB/s

External USB3.0 8TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 85.5 Write 96.5 Mixed 108 129% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.6 206% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 81%
WD My Passport 083A 2TB 995 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1GB free, PID 083a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 86 Write 34.3 Mixed 50.8 64% 57 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 45%
External USB3.0 4TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 26GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 143 141 136 125 113 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 130 Write 132 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 133 138% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 85%
hp v165w 16GB 1,163 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 11GB free, PID 5307 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.8 5.5 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	7.37% Terrible	Read 29.5 Write 6.3 Mixed 6 SusWrite 6.5 12% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.37% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 4x8GB 20,502 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68% Good	MC Read 28 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 27.4 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 26.1 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570M Pro4 Builds (Compare 903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 103%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570M Pro4

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	156x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	118x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	111x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	54x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	50x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	49x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	42x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	41x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	30x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	29x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $577

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16