Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 06:58
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 135
55% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 399
37% 310 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
MSI(1462 277C) 3GB
CLim: 972 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 34
Parallax 55.1
35% 44 fps
MRender 31.3
Gravity 43
Splatting 24.5
26% 32.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 115 120 121 118 52 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.4% Average
Read 197
Write 178
Mixed 180
SusWrite 102
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 21.1
81% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 42.7
DQ Mixed 31
24% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 102%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 235 244 235 242 240 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
191GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 117 120 121 117 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 102
Write 138
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 104
67% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.5
306% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 112%
Dell Portable 1TB
382GB free, PID 9009
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 49 48 49 50 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 91.6
Write 62.4
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 48.4
80% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL10-8GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
18% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5
16% 5.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 18%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback