Lenovo 30A80037US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 30A80037US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory56.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151222
Uptime32.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 06:43
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2676 v3
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 176
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 631
55% 469 Pts
64-Core 1272
79% 1272 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 392.56
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 19.9
17% 19.3 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 23
Splatting 16
16% 20.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8EV10171 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 824
Write 876
Mixed 534
166% 745 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 35.6
119% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 446
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 374
282% 381 MB/s
Poor: 123% Great: 230%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
335GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 389 385 385 386 387 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 390
Write 384
Mixed 358
SusWrite 389
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 36.8
124% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 256
200% 279 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43BB1-CPB M393A2K43BB1-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
122% Outstanding
MC Read 57.8
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 46.4
141% 49.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 19.8
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30A80037US Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 30A80037US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $600
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback