Alienware Aurora R11

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive340% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAlienware Aurora R11  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0N43JM
Memory56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201023
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 03:36
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900KF-$255
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 151
2-Core 303
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 1,173
104% 881 Pts
64-Core 2,071
128% 2,071 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Dell(1028 C722) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 188
Reflection 182
Parallax 185
154% 185 fps
Gravity 162
Splatting 134
129% 148 fps
Poor: 116% Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2274 2308 2311 1896 1525 1540 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
340% Outstanding
Read 2,352
Write 2,360
Mixed 1,776
SusWrite 1,976
476% 2,116 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 80
260% 89.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1091
DQ Write 911
DQ Mixed 1,002
750% 1,001 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 340%
Great: 431%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 121 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 115
Write 112
Mixed 93.3
SusWrite 119
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 83%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MKAOAA30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 152 151 151 151 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 146
Write 150
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 151
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 89%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00SPEB0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 121 121 121 121 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 120
Write 123
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 120
154% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
75% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 59%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 121 121 121 121 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 199
Write 161
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 120
181% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 60%
Great: 73%
HITACHI HUS724040ALE640 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0 0 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 155
Write 157
Mixed 90
SusWrite 0
125% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 31%
HITACHI HUS724040ALE640 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 157
Write 160
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 0
124% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 35.2
108% 38 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 46.6
SC Mixed 30.3
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora R11 Builds (Compare 1,511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 167%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora R11

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $880
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback