PT Sky 232 A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemPT Sky 232 A  (all builds)
MotherboardPT Sky 232 A
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190923
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 02:34
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 60.6
1-Core 46.2
2-Core 72.6
39% 59.8 Pts
4-Core 68.6
8-Core 72.5
9% 70.6 Pts
64-Core 74.5
5% 74.5 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Device(2782 1100) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 20.7.1
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
2.31% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 3.2
2% 3.3 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 5.3
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.31%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SMI L06B B0KB 128GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0831B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 262 13 11 15 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 441
Write 344
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 66.8
47% 215 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 2.8
27% 7.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 68%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB
10GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 7.1 8.2 8.5 1.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 4.2
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 6
12% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 2.6
194% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GB
1 of 3 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.1% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.8
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback