Biostar A10N-9630E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar A10N-9630E  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191230
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 01:59
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9630P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 49.9
2-Core 93
42% 67.9 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 148
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Asus(1043 03CA) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 480G B 480GB
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 368 364 359 371 364 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 414
Write 319
Mixed 335
SusWrite 364
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 16.9
88% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 31
61% 123 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 78%
Blackpcs 32GB
2GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
7% Terrible
Read 26.5
Write 10.8
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 11
14% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.7% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 8.6
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 7.1
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A10N-9630E Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A10N-9630E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback