Acer Aspire TC-895

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire TC-895  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-895
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '21 at 23:01
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100-$64
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 136
2-Core 267
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 728
78% 623 Pts
64-Core 726
45% 726 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375D) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 18.6
15% 18.4 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 17
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512 512GB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1098 1015 363 259 339 328 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,442
Write 1276
Mixed 1,219
SusWrite 567
252% 1,126 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 71.2
242% 86.5 MB/s
DQ Read 897
DQ Write 772
DQ Mixed 722
572% 797 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 205%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 24.5
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 26.7
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-895 Builds (Compare 1,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-895

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback