Asus G752VT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus G752VT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G752VT
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160621
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateJan 11 '21 at 22:11
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 144
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 508
50% 409 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
Asus(1043 1CED) 3GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.57
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.5% Below average
Lighting 36.8
Reflection 48.2
Parallax 31.3
30% 38.8 fps
MRender 40.4
Gravity 41
Splatting 35.4
32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme ADATA SX6000LNP 512GB
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2s16 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 655 717 733 723 757 765 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,712
Write 694
Mixed 659
SusWrite 725
209% 947 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 31.8
110% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 60.3
DQ Mixed 117
99% 150 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 154%
Great: 229%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
226GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 108 110 107 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 83.5
Write 82.6
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 109
54% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.9% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G752VT Builds (Compare 334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Asus G752VT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback