MSI A320M GRENADE (MS-7A39)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A39
MotherboardMSI A320M GRENADE (MS-7A39)  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '17 at 02:47
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 187
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 567
54% 447 Pts
64-Core 827
51% 827 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Lighting 71.1
Reflection 70.4
Parallax 60.9
58% 67.5 fps
MRender 72.6
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 69.4
57% 69.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$93
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 489
Write 212
Mixed 278
72% 326 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 10.8
80% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 53.8
DQ Mixed 9.8
16% 30.8 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 175
Mixed 162
126% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.29
4K Write 2.33
4K Mixed 0.27
127% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROU 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 1067 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.8
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M GRENADE (MS-7A39) Builds (Compare 208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M GRENADE (MS-7A39)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback