Asus A88X-PLUS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A88X-PLUS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160307
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 29 '17 at 21:40
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 74.1
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 123
54% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 200
25% 192 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.5.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Lighting 65.1
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 81.8
53% 68.7 fps
MRender 56.1
Gravity 52.6
Splatting 74.2
51% 61 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 460
Write 197
Mixed 190
62% 283 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 10
72% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 67.1
DQ Mixed 27.5
46% 93.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 82%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: GG2OAF10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 91.1
Write 91.8
Mixed 104
72% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.16
58% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 2133 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.5% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 13.9
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88X-PLUS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus A88X-PLUS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $1,047
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback