Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '21 at 01:07
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 125
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 187
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
Asus(1043 059B) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Lighting 74.6
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 94.1
61% 79.1 fps
MRender 55.4
Gravity 74
Splatting 42.4
46% 57.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 85 45 120 34 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 304
Write 200
Mixed 214
SusWrite 102
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 26.3
102% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 119
114% 178 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 100%
Imation Expert M250 1TB
374GB free, PID 1913
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 36 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 32.9
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 36
44% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.3% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 20.8
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 21.1
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,924 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback