Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-K R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '21 at 22:11
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 256
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 507
68% 507 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
Asus(1043 845B) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 23
15% 20.3 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 25.3
Splatting 20.6
19% 23.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 263 235 212 196 189 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 315
Mixed 306
SusWrite 233
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 44.3
148% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 243
209% 311 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
198GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 88 90 93 94 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 93.9
Write 92.9
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 91.9
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
696GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 137 140 141 141 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 74.7
Write 73.4
Mixed 57
SusWrite 140
63% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 96%
Philips USB Flash Drive 8GB
7GB free, PID 5100
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 9 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.42% Terrible
Read 34.5
Write 12
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 10.3
18% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.42%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CB8GU2666.C8JT 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 11.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-K R2.0 Builds (Compare 7,170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback