Dell Inspiron 5675

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Inspiron 5675  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0477DV
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '21 at 17:19
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 828
77% 642 Pts
64-Core 1,049
65% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580
Dell(1028 1701) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.3% Below average
Lighting 44.2
Reflection 61.6
Parallax 69.6
36% 58.5 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 52.2
Splatting 44.8
43% 53.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 136 164 175 137 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 503
Write 488
Mixed 400
SusWrite 185
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 36.2
128% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 210
195% 298 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 97%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
394GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 482 480 485 425 293 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 482
Mixed 460
SusWrite 440
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 54
179% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 367
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 119%
Great: 126%
SSK 256GB
50GB free
Firmware: 1507
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 211 211 210 210 209 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 354
Write 238
Mixed 298
SusWrite 210
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 24.4
79% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 110
83% 110 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 149 157 136 115 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 119
Mixed 109
SusWrite 138
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$89
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC1J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 121 121 122 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 123
Write 110
Mixed 56
SusWrite 120
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
558GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 174 175 175 175 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 143
Write 151
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 175
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 113%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB
3TB free, PID 25fa
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 98 99 98 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 87.8
Write 97.5
Mixed 66
SusWrite 98.3
120% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.7
221% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 63%
SanDisk Cruzer 128GB
94GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 27
Write 17.5
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 15.2
26% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.7
175% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 17%
HGST HTS 725050A7E630 500GB
330GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 32
Mixed 31
SusWrite 23.7
41% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 18%
WDC WD10 JPVX-60JC3T0 1TB
205GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3 3 3 3 4.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 32.5
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 3.2
30% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 19%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
26GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 13 17 13 17 17 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
8.85% Terrible
Read 28.8
Write 3.3
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 14.1
18% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.85%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2400 C16 Series Hynix HMA82GU6AFR8N-UH 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 27.2
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 25.9
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inspiron 5675 Builds (Compare 826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Dell Inspiron 5675

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback