Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H55M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '17 at 13:53
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$45
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 59.8
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 108
45% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 181
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Zotac(19DA 2188) 512MB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 364.72
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 2TB
251GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 42%
Virtual Disk 56GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 39.9
Write 42.1
Mixed 69.2
39% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.78
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 1.3
284% 1.79 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
26.7% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 11.4
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H55M-S2H Builds (Compare 390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $73
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback