Asus A68HM-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A68HM-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170804
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '21 at 16:36
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 9,821 User benchmarks, average bench 46% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	43.8% Average	Memory 53.1 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 116 47% 79.8 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 150 26% 180 Pts	64-Core 163 10% 163 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Lighting 42.8 Reflection 38.6 Parallax 55.3 35% 45.6 fps	MRender 54.5 Gravity 54.1 Splatting 42 40% 50.2 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Chronos 120GB-$70 862 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 609ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 102 107 111 99 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 356 Write 130 Mixed 177 SusWrite 105 42% 192 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 66.7 4K Mixed 30.4 109% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 84.2 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 99.5 77% 103 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 84%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 191 190 190 191 190 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 195 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 190 106% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 151% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: MS2OA8L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 186 183 184 186 184 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 180 Mixed 27.2 SusWrite 185 103% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G CT102464BD160B.C16 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1866, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.8% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 12.6 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.8 16% 5.7 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A68HM-PLUS Builds (Compare 494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-PLUS

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	59x
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples	46x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	35x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	59x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	51x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	41x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16