Lenovo 056956U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 056956U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170327
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateJan 10 '21 at 09:39
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 0
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 122
53% 86.6 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 318
35% 278 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kesu K600 240GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1120A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 339 83 9.3 75 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 462
Write 337
Mixed 300
SusWrite 125
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 20
84% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 78.2
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 0.4
45% 104 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 51 48 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 101
Write 82
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 49.3
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: MS1OA610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 128 135 131 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 143
Write 135
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 122
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 82%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101M 1TB
153GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 27 28 27 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 23.4
Mixed 25
SusWrite 27.4
36% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.9% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 7.5
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback