MSI B250M PRO-VD (MS-7A74)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A74
MotherboardMSI B250M PRO-VD (MS-7A74)  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680x1050x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '21 at 07:56
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 178
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 264
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
MSI(1462 7A74) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.24% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 3.8
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 6.3
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.24%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 806 445 471 469 476 353 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 2337
Write 1,651
Mixed 1,387
SusWrite 504
326% 1,470 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 75.7
255% 88 MB/s
DQ Read 846
DQ Write 420
DQ Mixed 456
385% 574 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 232%
Great: 311%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
141GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 144 149 147 149 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 117
Write 133
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 146
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 183 189 185 191 199 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 149
Write 166
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 187
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 106%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
15GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 11 19 15 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
9.49% Terrible
Read 27.4
Write 17.8
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 14.9
22% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
52% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.49%
Great: 35%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB
28GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 21 22 22 22 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 22.4
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 20.6
32% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 2.9
207% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.9% Very good
MC Read 25
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 24.8
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23.1
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B250M PRO-VD (MS-7A74) Builds (Compare 2,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI B250M PRO-VD (MS-7A74)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $156
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback