Gigabyte GA-X5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X5  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '21 at 04:14
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 223
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 594
61% 490 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M
Gigabyte(1458 1557) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 949 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 20% Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 386 347 330 312 378 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 945
Write 570
Mixed 416
SusWrite 357
127% 572 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 20.9
92% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 150
116% 158 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 332%
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
223GB free
Firmware: N181017a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 439 445 390 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 456
Write 429
Mixed 371
SusWrite 294
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 20.6
70% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 46.7
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 19.9
17% 26 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3N18AES4.16FE 1315 CT102464BF186D.M16 1315 BLS8G3N18AES4.16FE 1315 CT102464BF186D.M16 32GB
1867, 1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.2% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 19.3
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 22.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X5 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback