Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER C15B
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150108
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJan 09 '21 at 12:10
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4712MQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 161
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 402
39% 320 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 940M
Device(1B0A 2109) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6089
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
9.78% Terrible
Lighting 13.2
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 11.1
11% 13.2 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 14
Splatting 9.3
8% 9.57 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.78%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 260 248 247 247 243 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 444
Write 285
Mixed 254
SusWrite 256
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 33.1
125% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 241
203% 296 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86%
Great: 128%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB
841GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 112 112 111 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 111
Write 102
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 111
65% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 15.6
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback