Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 08 '21 at 21:26
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$64
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 247
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 440
52% 404 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Lighting 115
Reflection 117
Parallax 107
94% 113 fps
MRender 95.6
Gravity 106
Splatting 101
82% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 446
Write 476
Mixed 382
97% 435 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 47.2
156% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 149
118% 163 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
147GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 301 301 301 301 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 437
Write 338
Mixed 397
SusWrite 309
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 45.9
151% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 138
110% 156 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
10GB free
Firmware: KC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 73 72 73 75 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 82.7
Write 81
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 72.1
48% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.4
168% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121
5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 216 215 216 218 215 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
12GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 113 121 123 114 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 100
Write 96.8
Mixed 63
SusWrite 120
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 109%
Seagate Portable 1TB
680GB free, PID 2343
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 38 39 39 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 34
Write 36.3
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 37.9
48% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
69% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2D3200C16 0215 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 0215 CMK16GX4M2D3200C16 0215 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
3100, 3100, 3100, 3100 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.1% Outstanding
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 31.7
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 27.3
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 1,372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 5 - $167

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $745
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback