Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 4,124 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 78.2 1-Core 103 2-Core 177 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 218 41% 283 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2200 2,904 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Legend(17AA 224D) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4166 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 23.6 Reflection 35.6 Parallax 31.5 19% 30.2 fps	MRender 28.9 Gravity 26.6 Splatting 23.7 21% 26.4 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 20%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 995 Write 368 Mixed 669 149% 677 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 42 135% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 456 DQ Write 628 DQ Mixed 518 398% 534 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 249GB free Firmware: LNM6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 103 104 104 107 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 39.2 Write 14.8 Mixed 49 SusWrite 88.8 36% 48 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.2 74% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M474A1G43EB1-CRC Kingston 9905624-008.A00G M474A1G43EB1-CRC Kingston 9905624-016.A00G 32GB 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58% Above average	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 20.7 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 16.5 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 84 48% 84 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16