Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5300-$59 18,604 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Memory 21.6 1-Core 37.5 2-Core 49.6 21% 36.2 Pts	4-Core 65 8-Core 65.7 9% 65.3 Pts	64-Core 64.2 4% 64.2 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 0292) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	2.92% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 4.9 Parallax 2.9 3% 3.77 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 3.3 Splatting 4.7 3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.92% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3402111A 40GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 19 7.4 20 22 22 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 39 Write 39 Mixed 24.4 SusWrite 17.6 22% 30 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 28%
Seagate ST380011A 80GB-$43 2,329 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 22GB free Firmware: 8.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 21 11 21 23 23 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 25.5 Write 28.6 Mixed 20.3 SusWrite 19.4 17% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 4 10% 3.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 4.4 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 309 13% 309 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	34x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	32x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	30x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	41x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	34x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	20x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $87