Asrock 770 Extreme3

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 770 Extreme3 (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111024
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '21 at 17:01
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 77.7 1-Core 48.6 2-Core 98.2 48% 74.8 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 289 30% 243 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 3545) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.92% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 3 Parallax 0.3 2% 1.87 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.92% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S400 120GB 1,721 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1115A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 18 21 30 32 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.1% Below average	Read 252 Write 152 Mixed 190 SusWrite 26.3 34% 155 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 15.2 78% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 27 DQ Write 72 DQ Mixed 1.1 15% 33.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 97%
Maxtor 6Y120M0 120GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 32GB free Firmware: YAR51EW0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 22 23 31 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 41 Write 45.2 Mixed 32.9 SusWrite 28.6 27% 36.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 32%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 10GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.6 6.1 12 7.4 9.5 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 25.8 Write 13 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 9.4 22% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 2 171% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.9% Poor	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 11.6 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 8.3 20% 6.97 GB/s	Latency 85 47% 85 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 770 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 770 Extreme3

CPU
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	4x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
HD 7870AMD $203Bench 26%, 42,130 samples	2x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	2x

SSD
600 240GBSeagate $215Bench 82%, 3,595 samples	2x
SU760 512GBAdataBench 89%, 1,247 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 60GBKingston $76Bench 48%, 24,219 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	4x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	2x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $347

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16