MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 08 '21 at 10:22
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 147
2-Core 287
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 826
87% 698 Pts
64-Core 1,038
64% 1,038 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57% Above average
Lighting 74.1
Reflection 64.5
Parallax 95.1
60% 77.9 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 76.5
Splatting 47.3
50% 63.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 265 264 265 264 267 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 442
Mixed 371
SusWrite 286
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 47.2
162% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 198
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97%
Great: 114%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
667GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 72 87 85 93 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 114
Write 1.7
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 79.4
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
739GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 138 138 138 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 139
Write 128
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 137
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 60%
0GB free
Firmware: 0101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 48
Write 33.7
Mixed 26.6
27% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 27%
Verbatim STORE N GO 248GB
34GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 38 21 18 38 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 255
Write 105
Mixed 127
SusWrite 24.4
145% 128 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 9.8
846% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 19
DQ Write 14
DQ Mixed 10.8
914% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 85%
SMI USB DISK 32GB
24GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 114
Write 27.4
Mixed 41.1
SusWrite 24.4
56% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
86% 2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2Z3200C16 CMW16GX4M2Z3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 38.2
96% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 37.7
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback