HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	9.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111110
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '21 at 10:17
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$182 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 89 1-Core 93.8 2-Core 186 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 435 49% 386 Pts	64-Core 459 28% 459 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% MSI(1462 2805) 1GB CLim: 1204 MHz, MLim: 1456 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	9.42% Terrible	Lighting 10.4 Reflection 16.2 Parallax 13.9 8% 13.5 fps	MRender 15.7 Gravity 14.1 Splatting 12.2 11% 14 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.42% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 128GB 5,641 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: JULA SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 449 337 178 144 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Read 485 Write 448 Mixed 430 SusWrite 273 92% 409 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 69.8 4K Mixed 37.9 120% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 332 250% 336 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 104%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 116GB free Firmware: JP2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 82 81 82 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 87.3 Write 90 Mixed 51.5 SusWrite 81 57% 77.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.4% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 10.6 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 11.9 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,772 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	686x
Core i7-2600Intel $182Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	598x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	317x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	142x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	56x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16