Dell OptiPlex 390

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 390
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 390  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180624
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 08 '21 at 05:55
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 128
54% 89.1 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 178
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3747) 2GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.2% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 34
Parallax 32.5
27% 33.2 fps
MRender 36.2
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 23.5
25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 113 134 92 31 84 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.8% Poor
Read 126
Write 83.2
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 93.7
21% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 8.9
34% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 9.5
DQ Write 17.3
DQ Mixed 28.3
17% 18.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
228GB free
Firmware: 1003YAM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 18 17 20 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
87GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 83 83 83 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 76.7
Write 71.5
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 82
51% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 70%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 16GB
1GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.8 10 9.7 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 11.7
Mixed 10
SusWrite 10.1
18% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.6
101% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 28%
VendorCo ProductCode 8GB
2GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 20 19 20 20 17 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
8.6% Terrible
Read 27.3
Write 15.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 17.7
21% 17 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.6%
Great: 8%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
1GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.2 4.5 4.3 4.6 4.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
9.77% Terrible
Read 31.1
Write 4
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 4.4
12% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.7
108% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.77%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 390 Builds (Compare 2,511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback