HP Pavilion zd8000 (PU742AV#ABA)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion zd8000 (PU742AV#ABA)  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta 3082
Memory1.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20050920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '21 at 22:35
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 2.80GHz-$15
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 55.3
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 32
27% 36.8 Pts
4-Core 32.1
8-Core 32.3
4% 32.2 Pts
64-Core 32.2
2% 32.2 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST960822A 60GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 16 13 13 16 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 23.8
Write 31.2
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 17.5
18% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback