Medion E2225 2397

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion E2225 2397  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H81H3-EM2
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '21 at 11:44
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 52%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 184
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 178
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.1% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 45.9
Parallax 33.7
28% 38.1 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 26.9
28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$78
705GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 404 427 425 418 391 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 436
Mixed 393
SusWrite 385
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 49.8
165% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 286
228% 319 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 110%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 1311 M2F4G64CB88B7N-DI 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.1% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E2225 2397 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E2225 2397

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $194
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback