| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110926 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 07 '21 at 11:38 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 25% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
45.2%
Average
|
51% 79.8 Pts
|
15% 116 Pts
|
9% 138 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
88.6%
Excellent
|
88% 125 fps
|
90% 109 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 233 236 295 297 298 MB/s
|
77.8%
Very good
|
77% 341 MB/s
|
141% 45.8 MB/s
|
49% 68.6 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 M378B5773QB0-CK0 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
|
40.5%
Average
|
40% 13.9 GB/s
|
36% 12.8 GB/s
|
41% 97.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 961 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $125Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 161x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 122x |
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 116x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 73x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 51x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 46x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $153 |