Asus P9X79 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics203% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 WS  (all builds)
Memory58 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180507
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJan 06 '21 at 19:35
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2-$142
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 183
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 729
64% 547 Pts
64-Core 1,123
70% 1,123 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4900 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
203% Outstanding
Lighting 287
Reflection 298
Parallax 346
234% 310 fps
MRender 364
Gravity 267
Splatting 196
216% 276 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 203%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB
685GB free
Firmware: 32A0T2IA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1746 1812 1798 1815 1822 1807 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 2,201
Write 1844
Mixed 1,467
SusWrite 1,800
410% 1,828 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 56.4
182% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 481
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 420
309% 409 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 273%
Great: 373%
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 178 162 110 118 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 358
Write 240
Mixed 246
SusWrite 142
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 28.2
97% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 122
116% 180 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 91%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
72GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 230 232 234 229 230 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 381
Write 244
Mixed 256
SusWrite 227
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 36.3
127% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 266
201% 272 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 95%
ST5000AS0011-1L5178 5TB
8GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 81 82 79 81 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.75% Terrible
Read 39
Write 69.7
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 82.7
13% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 0.9
7% 3.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 2.7
DQ Mixed 2.5
2% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.75%
Great: 17%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145
1GB free
Firmware: SC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 25.8
Write 29.7
Mixed 29
21% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 100%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145
18GB free
Firmware: SC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46% Average
Read 81.8
Write 69.7
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 78.2
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST4000VX000-1F4168 4TB
36GB free
Firmware: CV14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 82 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 104
Write 87.2
Mixed 65
SusWrite 81.5
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72AZ-1G9E2 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
103% Outstanding
MC Read 46.4
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 37.5
118% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 11.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 103%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 WS Builds (Compare 435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 WS - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $843
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback