HP Z220 CMT Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Z220 CMT Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1790
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '21 at 16:08
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2-$368 2,442 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	54.2% Above average	Memory 70.5 1-Core 51.8 2-Core 111 48% 77.7 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 434 37% 319 Pts	64-Core 503 31% 503 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Lighting 71.7 Reflection 74 Parallax 67.6 58% 71.1 fps	MRender 66.4 Gravity 71.9 Splatting 67.7 56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$109 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 644GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 449 447 460 463 465 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	Read 472 Write 456 Mixed 417 SusWrite 454 101% 450 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 35.8 112% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 318 242% 326 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 128%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145 41,734 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 1.5TB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 449 447 460 464 465 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 455 Mixed 399 SusWrite 454 101% 448 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 46.5 4K Mixed 35.8 113% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 273 DQ Mixed 288 224% 308 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GB 618 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.6 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 10.3 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z220 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 1,303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: HP Z220 CMT Workstation

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	616x
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $248Bench 70%, 2,869 samples	158x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	108x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	73x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	71x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	42x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,354 samples	33x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 4x4GBMicronBench 55%, 1,512 samples	25x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16