Asus P5K-E

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	7.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5K-E (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080312
Uptime	7 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '21 at 14:46
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	47.1% Average	Memory 70.7 1-Core 33.7 2-Core 69.6 39% 58 Pts	4-Core 139 8-Core 137 18% 138 Pts	64-Core 139 9% 139 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4770 1,570 User benchmarks, average bench 8% MSI(1462 1960) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	7.65% Terrible	Lighting 9.5 Reflection 13.2 Parallax 9.1 8% 10.6 fps	MRender 8.8 Gravity 8.6 Splatting 9.7 8% 9.03 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.65% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 219 224 224 226 228 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.8% Good	Read 248 Write 230 Mixed 213 SusWrite 223 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 34.1 113% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 42.8 DQ Write 44.3 DQ Mixed 50.5 36% 45.9 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 129%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 32GB 1,207 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 26GB free, PID 00d2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 21 22 22 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 33.1 Write 19.9 Mixed 12.8 SusWrite 22 28% 22 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 35% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 37%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB 1,626 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 26GB free, PID 00ed Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 12 12 13 12 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	7.92% Terrible	Read 32.4 Write 14 Mixed 11.8 SusWrite 11.1 20% 17.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.9 43% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.92% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	19% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 5.5 17% 5.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.6 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 99.8 40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5K-E Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K-E

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	55x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	17x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	15x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	10x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	9x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x
256GB SSD 256GB3Bench 62%, 1,638 samples	5x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	105x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	21x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $180

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16