Asrock P67 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock P67 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '21 at 13:14
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 25,078,680 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 73.7
2-Core 141
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 465
46% 374 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700
Diamond(1092 6750) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
8.42% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 9.9
9% 11 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 7.9
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.42%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 74 78 70 69 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 147
Write 110
Mixed 126
SusWrite 72.7
26% 114 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 21.1
86% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 96.6
75% 103 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 61%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
105GB free
Firmware: 2.22
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 193
Write 84
Mixed 105
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 16.2
64% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 71.1
DQ Write 31.4
DQ Mixed 39.3
32% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 61%
Hitachi HDT722525DLA380 250GB-$59
61GB free
Firmware: V44OA91A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 58 56 58 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 48.5
Write 47.2
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 57.4
35% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 36%
Maxtor 7H500F0 500GB-$50
20GB free
Firmware: HA431DN0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 60 59 61 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 61.2
Write 65.5
Mixed 38
SusWrite 61.2
42% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.8
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme4 - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $789
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback