Notebook W650EH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemNotebook W650EH  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W650EH
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130506
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateJan 06 '21 at 03:43
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3360M
U29, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 83
2-Core 145
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 199
29% 212 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
Clevo(1558 6500) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
6.38% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 6
Parallax 9.5
6% 7.77 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 9.3
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.38%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sapphire 240GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 352 329 352 102 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.2% Good
Read 461
Write 363
Mixed 232
SusWrite 252
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 17.3
70% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 69.6
78% 130 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 64%
Fujitsu MHZ2250BH G2 250GB
59GB free
Firmware: 00000009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 43 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 45.2
Write 33.5
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 43.7
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 17.9
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W650EH Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W650EH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback