TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ROG STRIX B450-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '21 at 00:41
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 243
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 734
64% 546 Pts
64-Core 1,328
82% 1,328 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 75.2%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
MSI(1462 3752)
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.3% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 102
Parallax 118
95% 112 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 100
Splatting 92.4
87% 108 fps
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 92.3%
 Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$145
688GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1227 1386 1533 1142 1183 1074 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 2,294
Write 1671
Mixed 1,448
SusWrite 1,258
373% 1,668 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 40.4
154% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 907
DQ Write 87.5
DQ Mixed 186
215% 394 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑
This bench: 238%
 Great: 372%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
532GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 171 170 165 177 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 151
Mixed 96.3
SusWrite 169
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 96.6%
 Great: 109%
AS Mass Storage 32GB
25GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 26.6
Mixed 13.2
19% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.9
82% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 32.5
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 29.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 110%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ROG STRIX B450-E GAMING Builds (Compare 597 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-E GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples129x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD  $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples80x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples67x
GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples46x
RX 5700-XTAMD  $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples37x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia  $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples36x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $70Bench 276%, 367,854 samples34x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples24x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBAdata  $58Bench 242%, 74,184 samples21x
RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples29x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples23x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples23x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback