Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '21 at 00:27
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 74.6
1-Core 155
2-Core 303
94% 178 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 747
76% 613 Pts
64-Core 747
46% 747 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
72.2% Very good
Lighting 96.4
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 79.3
79% 88.9 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 80.7
Splatting 72
60% 73.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M9PeG 256GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 234 193 206 213 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,978
Write 779
Mixed 936
SusWrite 242
216% 984 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 82
281% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 778
DQ Write 791
DQ Mixed 699
549% 756 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 216%
Great: 205%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
38GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,903
Write 6,368
Mixed 7,355
1,676% 7,542 MB/s
4K Read 613
4K Write 396
4K Mixed 413
1,667% 474 MB/s
DQ Read 1,730
DQ Write 1,393
DQ Mixed 1,402
1,093% 1,508 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Ngff 2242 120GB SSD
76GB free
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 408 410 312 51 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 466
Write 405
Mixed 324
SusWrite 272
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 20.7
124% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 83.4
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 26.3
72% 145 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: SBC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 126 127 125 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 88.8
Write 88.3
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 125
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.2
103% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 179 181 180 184 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 147
Write 138
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 182
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.8
258% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 95%
Great: 88%
I-O DATA HDEL-UT 3TB
817GB free, PID 0160
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 141 136 143 143 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 115
Write 99.3
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 141
129% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 67%
BUFFALO HD-EDS-A 3TB
81GB free, PID 02cc
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 88.9
Write 90.6
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 72.2
109% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 80%
I-O DATA HDCZ-UT 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 016c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 142 143 142 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 142
Write 148
Mixed 108
SusWrite 143
184% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 72%
BUFFALO External HDD 2TB
888GB free, PID 0286
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 207 207 205 207 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 190
Write 144
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 205
204% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 78%
Great: 76%
BUFFALO External HDD 2TB
259GB free, PID 024d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 27.3
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 14
33% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 19%
BUFFALO HD-PCFU3 500GB
116GB free, PID 0290
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 68 81 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 87.9
Write 86.2
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 72.5
91% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 37%
I-O DATA HDPC-U 750GB
38GB free, PID 0135
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 25.2
Mixed 23
SusWrite 13.1
30% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGU88C-26N190A 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2734 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 33.5
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 32.7
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 4,681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0 - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback