Asus PRIME B350-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME B350-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '21 at 14:58
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Memory 72.8 1-Core 114 2-Core 226 76% 138 Pts	4-Core 451 8-Core 768 74% 609 Pts	64-Core 937 58% 937 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 368E) 2GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	34.6% Below average	Lighting 44.4 Reflection 53 Parallax 36.7 36% 44.7 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 42.3 Splatting 36.5 32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dogfish 64GB 64GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8301c64 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 242 Write 217 Mixed 202 49% 220 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 69.7 4K Mixed 31.2 116% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 42.9 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 64.1 66% 101 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 93%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 599GB free Firmware: AX003J SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 100 101 100 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 99.7 Write 96 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 99.4 60% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 57%
WD WD1600BS-56RPB5 160GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 149GB free Firmware: 10.02E02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Read 60.5 Write 56.5 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 60.5 39% 53.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 16GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	MC Read 32.9 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 29 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 32.2 SC Mixed 24.8 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 95.1 42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME B350-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350-PLUS - $92

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	982x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	424x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	389x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	494x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	304x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	279x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	154x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	154x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	88x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	262x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	129x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	126x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $443

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16