HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	73.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84FD
Memory	6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200528
Uptime	14.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '21 at 07:44
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$250 79,875 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 120 2-Core 102 69% 104 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 997 61% 600 Pts	64-Core 1,005 62% 1,005 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.7% Very good	Lighting 93.6 Reflection 92.9 Parallax 83.9 76% 90.1 fps	MRender 95.2 Gravity 86.9 Splatting 73.7 68% 85.3 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB 31,797 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 222 227 163 388 265 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 824 Write 366 Mixed 421 SusWrite 253 103% 466 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 81.5 4K Mixed 36.4 149% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 656 DQ Write 235 DQ Mixed 254 238% 382 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 147%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 570GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 156 160 160 160 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Read 153 Write 148 Mixed 103 SusWrite 158 103% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB 8,406 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	46.5% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 13.9 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.9 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 65.1 61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,084 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	2,381x
Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	2,014x
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	712x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	1,330x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	829x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	713x

SSD
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	1,400x
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples	1,228x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 152%, 17,295 samples	295x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples	1,899x
HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 4,169 samples	778x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	453x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16