Acer Aspire A715-74G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A715-74G  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Pidgey_CFS
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateJan 05 '21 at 07:14
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 129
2-Core 254
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 636
71% 558 Pts
64-Core 824
51% 824 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Acer(1025 1337) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4166
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 39.2
30% 38.6 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 26.7
25% 31.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2200_MTFD 256GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,538
Write 936
Mixed 888
247% 1,121 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 51.8
172% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 797
DQ Write 859
DQ Mixed 786
603% 814 MB/s
Poor: 114% Great: 208%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
671GB free
Firmware: JU001J
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,027
Write 35.5
Mixed 67
1,224% 1,710 MB/s
4K Read 761
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 5.1
32,307% 256 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S1ME-4 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.2% Above average
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.1
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 21.1
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A715-74G Builds (Compare 249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A715-74G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback